[Earthsea] Choosing to Not Take Control
In which Ged chooses not to learn silence and stillness
Week two of our summer A Wizard of Earthsea book club! And a shoutout to the reader who told me he’s reading the novel aloud to two of his sons in concert with Other Feminisms.
In Chapter Two, “The Shadow,” Ged observes forbearance but struggles to learn it.
For when it rained Ogion would not even say the spell that every weatherworker knows, to send the storm aside. In a land where sorcerers come thick, like Gont or the Enlades, you may see a raincloud blundering slowly from side to side and place to place as one spell shunts it on to the next, till at last it is buffeted out over the sea where it can rain in peace. But Ogion let the rain fall where it would. He found a thick fir-tree and lay down beneath it. Ged crouched among the dripping bushes wet and sullen, and wondered what was the good of having power if you were too wise to use it, and wished he had gone as prentice to that old weatherworker of the Vale, where at least he would have slept dry.
I love LeGuin’s writing and her image of “a raincloud blundering slowly from side to side and place to place as one spell shunts it on to the next.” It’s a comic, cartoonish image of what our willfulness can wreak. It reminds me of C.S. Lewis’s Screwtape Letters in the way it pokes fun at our pride in our own power.
I went through a couple titles of this post, trying to gesture pithily to what confuses Ged here. My first attempt was “Choosing to Give Up Control” which I think takes Ged’s position too strongly! It sounds like, by default, Ogion is directing the clouds and chooses to relax that control. When you have the power to order the world to your design, experiencing the world as it is becomes an active choice, too, and sometimes a burdensome one.
In my Plough essay “Let the Body Testify,” I drew on Sarah Zhang’s reporting for the Atlantic on Denmark’s universal screening for Down Syndrome.
The introduction of a choice reshapes the terrain on which we all stand. To opt out of testing is to become someone who chose to opt out. To test and end a pregnancy because of Down syndrome is to become someone who chose not to have a child with a disability. To test and continue the pregnancy after a Down syndrome diagnosis is to become someone who chose to have a child with a disability. Each choice puts you behind one demarcating line or another.
When their child was a choice, for parents to have or abort a child with a disability became part of their expressive identity. If their child had been disabled after birth in an accident, the parents would not feel that everyone who knew them looked at their child’s condition as a choice that the parents had made. It would be simply who their child was.
For those children, there’s no safe place to be buffeted to, in the way the Earthsea rainclouds finally escape a weatherworker’s wishes. For the parents, there’s a world of Geds, asking “How can you choose this when you might choose otherwise?”
Where do you feel the burden of choice, making it hard to welcome what you’d accept unchosen?
What stood out to you from this chapter?
There were many excellent comments in our Chapter One thread, and I’d love to highlight this from Ana:
The chapter starts by noting the absence of examples of power Duny could have seen: his older brothers have left home and “there was no one to bring the child up in tenderness.” Not to twist words, but love is power, and therefore the power of tenderness, whether from friendship or familial care is an example of power visibly lacking without his mother or siblings or close peers (he likes to know what they don’t, not share in it) and with a “grim unspeaking” father.
There’s another absence worth noting: the lack of other characters’ names, and his father’s silence. There’s all this talk of naming and Duny learning the names of things but we don’t know the names of his parents, family members, or townsfolk.
"God delights in our choosing," were the words I remember that have stayed with me from listening to one of the fathers who host the "Godsplaining" podcast speak about virtues. The subject in question was not about when we have to choose between right and wrong, which is simple enough even if it is difficult, but about when we have to make choices between two good or neutral things. I am burdened by small choices all the time (what neighborhood should I meet my old friend at?), and they feel like distractions (the point is to find a comfortable location to chat with my friend, not to engage on an hour long research project to find the best sandwich in town located at the perfect transit intersection of our addresses, or a half-hour research project into free public park events in the coming weeks). In those moments of pressing anxiety over trivial details that can be interpreted as choices, but can also be left as not-that-many-choices, I enjoy turning the details over to God and remembering that there is a providential element to the here and now, to what's easiest or closest, or, indeed, seemingly arbitrary and inferior, and then I try to choose to find the perfections around my limited and imperfect and "random" choice when I make it, once I'm in it. That's the choice that I try to remind myself is most important: finding and encountering what's present. That said, I'm always nervous about "complacency" or failing to notice the opportunity to exercise choosing and investigating options.
Choice is not what stood out to me while reading this chapter, though. Instead, it was friendship. Rather than the word love, it is friendship that comes to mind when I read about Ogion's relationship to the raincloud. Once a thing is a friend, which is to say, once the wizard knows "its true being: which is more than its use," that's when he can name the thing. "What, after all, is the use of you? or of myself? Is Gont Mountain useful, or the Open Sea?" When we love things we don't think of their use, but of their being, and enjoy that being and want to share with it more in friendship.
I also noticed another contrast between Ogion's silence and Ged's father's: "[t]hough a very silent man, he was so mild and calm that Ged soon lost awe of him." It is not Ged's father's silence so much as his restlessness and intensity that intimidate. And that restlessness again suggests less control, less choice in the silence.
I could also see how Ged was learning from Ogion through Ogion's gift of friendship to him. He tells Ged to "take as long as he liked," on errands, "giving him freedom to spend all day wandering by rainfilled streams," giving him the gift to befriend the environment. So, when Ged encounters the girl by the flowers one day, "[h]e would not have spoken to her," if not for her speaking to him first: he has learned silence from Ogion.
Her talk, then, is what stood out to me next, and how manipulative it was, how it took control from Ged. He was put in a position of reacting rather than reflecting and choosing whether or not to react. "She made him tell all the story of his tricks" for example, after she "went on talking in an open, careless, willful way," which is an odd combination: careless AND willful at the same time.
Because Ogion treated Ged with love, Ged came "to love this man Ogion who ... had no anger" and Ged only learns he loves him when Ogion extends a choice to Ged, of staying or going, reminding him of his freedom that he has been extending to him all this time. So, when Ged is made aware of how many more choices he has than he has previously realized, and that this nature of friendship is part of Ogion's teaching, he is filled with a realization of love.
I'm flattered to have part of my comment from last (last) week highlighted. I'd actually wondered if I hadn't "read too much" into the lack of names of Ged's family members, because I agree it feels natural, and consistent with genre and form, since the story has the shape of a folk tale and origin story of this to-be-hero Ged who is named by many names from the onset, and his life as a wizard. The early-early stuff is ahistorical in that sense. But nevertheless if nothing else, the lack of names affirm that Ged never really knew his mother, but also, neither does he (or maybe it's just we the readers who never) know his father or aunt for that matter, since only once a thing is known is it named.
I don't know where this story is going, but I am getting a flavor of "too ambitious for his own good"/"more power than sense."
This is a thing in real life, especially among people Ged's age. Teenagers have the power to crash their cars into people, and even the power to create new people. We rightly fear reckless driving and teen pregnancy. Even adults often have more power than sense. I don't trust most adults to sensibly handle nuclear weapons or strong AI. In a world with magic, the stakes could be very high.
But here's a different perspective. Can you think of any stories where mastery of a skill, and its concomitant power, are pursued for their own sake, or the sake of the journey there, and that's viewed as fine?
Tweet thread copied below: https://twitter.com/patio11/status/1673549979263303686
"Patrick McKenzie: One of the reasons I think anime is popular is sometimes avoids Cambell’s hero’s journey in favor of 'I’m going to achieve mastery for it’s own sake.' If you say that out loud in English fiction, *you are certainly the bad guy.*
"Much like there have been ten thousand reskins of Harry Potter I’ve been waiting for more central examples of English-language cultural products to take that story archetype and just run with it. There is clearly a demand.
"It wouldn’t be a minor tweak to have Peter Parker grow up hearing 'You have a great responsibility to earn great power.' but one can imagine utterly sympathetic characters with basically that motivation."
Does that ever work for dangerous skills like I'm guessing Earthsea magic will be? Or does it only work for safe skills, like baking in the anime Yakitate Japan? Personally, I have no need to be the best baker, or the best at anything, so it's hard for me to relate to the competition aspect of the pursuit of greatness. But I do like learning.
The only western fiction I can think of that revels in actively engaging the hard work of mastering a skill is Elcenia, an online fantasy series. It's a favorite of mine for that reason and others, so I'll drop a link here.
http://elcenia.com/