Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Missy Rose Ewing's avatar

I appreciate the unflinching look at how simpler solutions, like decoupling husband/father, don't seem aware of or take as their goal the design of the human child to be raised in one intact family.

My parents divorced when I was 8. I lived with my mom full-time and visited my dad regularly. The tension between them never healed. When I was planning my wedding and dealing with that tension, both communicated to me that they didn't realize they would still be "paying" for the divorce. It was eye-opening for me as I prepared for my own marriage.

On the other hand, my dad went out of his way to stay faithful to his commitment to me. He called me every night. This is before cell phones. He traveled frequently for work. So every night, we would arrange when he would call the next day. I would have to be at my mom's home to pick up the call (which probably kept me safe more than I knew during my angsty teen years). He would have to find a landline at whatever hotel, conference center, etc. he was at and duck out of business dinners to call his daughter. His fidelity to those phone calls has stayed with me my whole life. Physical presence doesn't necessarily mean actual presence and vice versa.

Expand full comment
Greg Gallagher's avatar

I love the anchor analogy, especially if it’s used to characterize the central virtues that make good fatherhood practicable. Rather than calling them “fidelity” or “patience,” however, I prefer thinking of them as gentleness, or restraint.

For me, the challenge with “fidelity” or “patience” is their temporal characteristic. They have to persist to be achieved. E.g. I lack fidelity if I screw up tomorrow, or next year, or next decade. No one thinks of a father as having fidelity in the five years before he left his family. Likewise, I lack patience if I lose it halfway through the afternoon with my children.

But with gentleness or restraint, or “praus” if you prefer the Gospel Greek, I can aim for that virtue in one individual reaction at a time. I can choose in this moment to be restrained – to keep my mouth shut, to hold my temper, to take a deep breath and manage my feelings. With restraint, I can break down good fatherhood into one individual moment at a time. But these are admittedly subjective readings of the words, so YMMV.

I don’t know how much gentleness or restraint I possessed the day my first son was born, but I know one of the things that’s helped me cultivate more of them by revising my self-image. I grew up nerdy and took a fair share of beatings from bullies, so it took me a long time to shake the mental image of myself as unimposing. But to my family, especially my small children, I am *enormous* - 6+ feet and 200 pounds of parent. That shift in self-image has helped me resist self-pity, which I think is the most unfatherly of all emotions. Because self-pity leads me to thinking about what I deserve from my children, as opposed to what they deserve from me. And for me, no gentleness comes from thinking of myself.

Expand full comment
26 more comments...

No posts