Discussion about this post

User's avatar
kathryn's avatar

I think one crucial way to defend the child without laying a burden on the most vulnerable mothers is to train doctors, nurses, etc. to not see poor women's children as a burden! So much medical care for pregnant women below a certain income/education level presumes that the child is unwanted, unplanned, or will face difficulties that mean they should never come into existence at all. While obviously there are real material difficulties that women need help overcoming, and I don't want to diminish those, I also wonder what would happen if the unborn child of a poor woman was treated with the same anticipation and joy by medical professionals as the unborn child of a woman who can afford to get treated in the fancy clinics. I'm expecting my first child and all my care providers thus far have assumed that this child was loved, wanted and planned because I am a well-educated, well-dressed young white woman with a steady income. (The joke's kind of on them: while this child is very loved and wanted, it was also very much not planned - but no one assumes that if you look and talk a certain way.) Nobody's tried to talk me out of having this baby or suggested that I should get on birth control when I tell them I'm not using contraception. This is very much not the experience of many women being treated in free clinics. But just because you might experience a financial burden because of your child doesn't necessarily mean you aren't just as excited to have that baby! Imagine if we assumed that all women experience a similar mix of joy, trepidation and excitement when they conceive a child, and celebrated with them as much as we say "that must be tough for you". While we work to lift the economic and social burdens that exist for vulnerable women, we also need to work to change our attitude towards children conceived in these situations, otherwise we send mixed messages about the value of their lives.

Expand full comment
Martha's avatar

I love this question: "How do we defend the child without laying a disproportionate burden on the most vulnerable mothers?"

I think the answer is in work that surrounds every mother with supportive care, material/financial resources and community support.

Here are some awesome policies and orgs that advocate for all families, although none identify as pro-life:

The Two Gen approach: The idea is that you work closely with parents and children together - not only one or the other. https://www.nga.org/center/issues/two-generation-approaches-to-serving-low-income-families/ (here's MN: https://mn.gov/dhs/2-generation/)

The Jeremiah Program: they work closely with single teen moms and their children to break the cycle of poverty using a 2-Gen approach. https://jeremiahprogram.org/

I'm a big fan of in home parent education as an early intervention. Here's one group that implements that well for teen moms - https://myhealthmn.org/becoming-program/

I'm also a big fan of the holistic policies in Scandinavian states, like the Finnish baby box, free healthcare and a strong social safety net including childcare and leave policies. The Finnish Baby Box is a particularly great story: https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-22751415

One thing to keep in mind when looking at the disproportionate impact of pro-life laws on marginalized women is their implementation - and that they don't ban abortion, they ban legal abortion. One study on the impact of implementation of pro-life laws was done in Ethiopia, where they repealed some abortion restrictions in an attempt to decrease maternal mortality: https://bmcmedethics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12910-019-0396-4

Expand full comment
11 more comments...

No posts