Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Catherine's avatar

I would say strong signs of marriageability 1) a person who has good friends who are other-oriented, are excited about having kids (or at least not afraid of children), and who are taking on responsibility in their own lives, 2) a person who does what they say they will do, or is honest when they haven't done that, 3) a person who can apologize, 4) a person who pursues delayed gratification (showing discipline) in some area of their life. 5) a sense of humor and joy in challenge (bonus if their family shares this strength), and lastly, 6) someone who thinks critically about their own values and isn't afraid to disagree respectfully with people they are close to.

Greg Gallagher's avatar

Others have responded by talking about what a marriageable man has, so I’ll add what I’ve learned about the vices I need to lack.

The image above includes a picture of Woodford Reserve. Once upon a time, I drank my body weight in that stuff. Slowly, I came to learn my biggest impediment to showing up as a husband and father was my relationship with appetite-based vices. If I want to be a good husband and father, I must strive to be a man of virtue. And in my experience, for men like me, the first virtue we need to pursue is temperance. If I’m intemperate, I’m not really practicing the selflessness and cheerful service that’s at the heart of being a husband and father.

Equally important, I needed to work on the vice of wrath. I am the biggest, strongest person in my house. I can either be my family’s single largest source of fear or calm, and it’s 100% on me which it’s going to be. I’ve had to learn the difference between primary anger – the uncontrollable response akin to pulling a hand away from a hot stove – and secondary anger. Secondary anger is the chosen, persisting anger that constitutes wrathfulness, and as far as I can tell, there is basically no place for secondary anger in my roles as a husband and father. CS Lewis would decry me for changing the definition of “gentleman” from its original meaning to “a gentle man,” but that’s exactly what I need to be in nearly all circumstances.

36 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?